Home › For developers › Acquiring projects
Acquiring development-stage projects: what you are buying, how deals are staged, what to check, and where the records are
A development-stage project is a bundle of rights and study positions, most of them conditional. This page sets out what published practitioners and the operators themselves say about that bundle: how prices and milestones are structured, which interconnection steps carry value in ERCOT, what the diligence list covers, where each item can be verified in a public record, and what the market data says about how many projects reach the finish.
Jump to: Stages, what transfers, and how payment is staged · Diligence: what to check · Public records for verification · The market: deal volume, prices and failure rates
Stages, what transfers, and how payment is staged
The two core rights, how purchase prices and milestone payments are typically structured, developer fees, land-agreement terms, and the ERCOT interconnection steps from request to stability assessment.
- Renewable projects typically change hands either during development or after they are operating, often preceded by an exclusivity agreement or LOI. (Norton Rose Fulbright Project Finance NewsWire, Feb 2020)
- Land rights and interconnection rights are the two core assets of a development-stage project. (Norton Rose Fulbright Project Finance NewsWire, Feb 2020)
- Development-stage purchase prices are often quoted in dollars per watt (DC for solar) of nameplate capacity. (Norton Rose Fulbright Project Finance NewsWire, Feb 2020)
- Typical milestone payments are staged at development completion, NTP and COD, with signing consideration framed as partial return of capital. (Norton Rose Fulbright Project Finance NewsWire, Feb 2020)
- Pre-NTP payments are usually based on an agreed estimate, and buyers may withhold post-closing milestone payments akin to an earn-out. (Norton Rose Fulbright Project Finance NewsWire, Feb 2020)
- In greenfield project-company sales (a UK/European practice guide), closing at an early/mid stage often pays only a small percentage up front with the balance deferred to ready-to-build and/or COD. (Osborne Clarke, 26 Feb 2021)
- Where closing occurs at ready-to-build (same UK/European guide), buyers commonly pay 100% of the price at closing; price adjustments key off net debt, installed capacity and costs. (Osborne Clarke, 26 Feb 2021)
- Developer fees lack a statutory definition; appraisers conventionally view 15–20% entrepreneurial incentive as reasonable and Treasury's 2012 memo cited 10–20% markups. (David Burton (Norton Rose Fulbright), Bloomberg BNA Daily Tax Report, 25 Nov 2014)
- Developer fees may be included in eligible basis for ITC/depreciation only if reasonable and arm's length. (David Burton (Norton Rose Fulbright), Bloomberg BNA Daily Tax Report, 25 Nov 2014)
- An option gives the developer the option term to perform due diligence, but stand-alone options may not be real-property interests and carry bankruptcy-avoidance risk. (Stoel Rives, The Law of Wind (online edition, © 2026))
- Wind energy land agreements usually provide an initial term of three to 10 years with periodic option/rental payments before operations. (Stoel Rives, The Law of Wind (online edition, © 2026))
- ERCOT's large-generation (≥10 MW) interconnection process typically runs 18–30 months excluding construction/supply delays; it is not a queue. (ERCOT (Fernandes), Generation Entity Winter Weather Preparedness workshop, Oct 28, 2024)
- ERCOT interconnection studies build only the 'driveway' (direct interconnection); network ('highway') upgrades are decided in the separate planning process. (ERCOT (Fernandes), Oct 28, 2024)
- ERCOT stage sequence is Request, Screening Study, Full Interconnection Study (which includes the Security Screening results and the IE-provided Reactive study), then the Quarterly Stability Assessment before synchronization; RIOO-IS is the application holding the modeling data. (ERCOT (Fernandes), Oct 28, 2024)
- An ERCOT INR (≥10 MW) must include proof of site control, a one-line diagram, RARF worksheets and a non-refundable fee; ERCOT has 10 days to review before starting the Screening Study. (ERCOT, Creating an INR for a Resource Larger than 10 MW, Jan 2022)
- After Screening Study results, the IE must advance (submit a change request / proceed to FIS) within 180 days or the request is cancelled; the SGIA is executed with the TSP. (IEEE PES Austin, ERCOT Generation Interconnection Studies Part 2, Nov 4, 2024)
- ERCOT runs a Quarterly Stability Assessment for generation expected to synchronize 5–7 months out (PG 5.3.5). (IEEE PES Austin, Nov 4, 2024)
Diligence: what to check
Revenue and basis risk, curtailment, environmental and title items, species and aviation, cultural review, decommissioning obligations, property tax, local siting restrictions, and tax-credit eligibility after the 2025 law.
- Physical fixed-volume hedges, used in place of a PPA in markets like ERCOT, fix revenue on a P99 shape and leave basis risk with the project owner. (Norton Rose Fulbright Project Finance NewsWire, 19 Jun 2019)
- Basis risk in hub-settled VPPAs: in Aug 2019 ERCOT North hub hit $9,000/MWh while a node was $1,000; a 300 MW project would have lost $2.4M in one hour. (Norton Rose Fulbright Project Finance NewsWire, 16 Jun 2020)
- ERCOT curtailed 5% of available wind and 9% of available utility-scale solar in 2022; EIA projects 13%/19% by 2035, with 36% of projected curtailment transmission-related. (U.S. EIA Today in Energy, 13 Jul 2023)
- Phase I ESAs under ASTM E1527-21 satisfy EPA All Appropriate Inquiries (effective May 13, 2022); components have a 180-day shelf life. (Quarles & Brady, 29 Mar 2022)
- ALTA/NSPS 2021 survey standards apply to contracts on/after Feb 23, 2021; the wetlands Table A item was removed and can be negotiated back in as Item 20. (Womble Bond Dickinson, 2021)
- In wind land diligence, severed mineral rights and multiple owners are common issues; a title company can help identify interested parties, and lenders or permitting may require landowner consents or estoppels. (Stoel Rives, The Law of Wind (online edition, © 2026))
- USACE describes a preliminary JD as non-binding/advisory and usually the most efficient option for a site; an Approved JD is appealable. (USACE Vicksburg District, Regulatory)
- USFWS IPaC generates an official ESA species list for a project area and may be used by proponents without a federal nexus. (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, IPaC instructions)
- FAA notice (Form 7460-1, filed via OE/AAA) is required for any structure over 200 feet AGL under 14 CFR Part 77. (FAA, Aeronautical Information Resources (AIR) Section 5-2)
- Any project with a federal permit, license or funds must be coordinated with the Texas Historical Commission under Section 106; most reviews complete within one 30-day period. (Texas Historical Commission, Project Review FAQ)
- Texas solar facility agreements: grantee must post financial assurance for removal by the earlier of termination or the 20th anniversary of COD, with cost estimates by the 10th anniversary and at least once every five years. (Tex. Util. Code §302.0005 (via texas.public.law))
- Texas BESS decommissioning law (eff. Sept 1, 2025) requires financial assurance by the 15th anniversary, versus 20th for solar and 10th for wind leases; waivers are void. (Baker Botts, Jul 2025)
- Texas Chapter 313 school-tax limitations expired Dec 31, 2022; of 804 projects that submitted reports, 66% are renewable energy projects. (Texas Comptroller, Chapter 313 Report 96-1359, 2025)
- JETI, the Chapter 313 successor (rules effective Jan 16, 2024), excludes renewable energy projects. (Texas Comptroller, Fiscal Notes, Mar 2024)
- Chapter 312 abatements (cities, counties, special districts; not school districts) expire September 1, 2029 unless the Legislature renews the chapter. (Tex. Tax Code §312.006)
- By end-2024 at least 459 counties/municipalities in 44 states had adopted severe local siting restrictions on renewables; 498 contested projects in 49 states. (Columbia Sabin Center, 30 Jun 2025)
- IRA §6418 credit transfers are made for cash payments; payments are excluded from seller income and non-deductible to buyer; recapture applies proportionately to transferees. (Mayer Brown, 8 May 2024)
- OBBBA: wind/solar 45Y/48E credits end for facilities placed in service after Dec 31, 2027 unless construction begins by July 4, 2026; Notice 2025-42 removed the 5% safe harbor except small solar. (Orrick, 22 Aug 2025)
- FEOC/material-assistance (Notice 2026-15): projects under construction by end-2025 need no calculation; non-PFE share must reach 60% for power projects starting 2030+, 55% rising to 75% for storage; supplier certificates may be relied on. (Norton Rose Fulbright Project Finance NewsWire, Feb 2026)
- Buyers should expect interconnection/deliverability as a common red flag; up to 93% of prospecting-phase capacity may never reach COD, and there is no standard stage-gate framework. (Wood Mackenzie, 7 Oct 2025 (orig. 1 Oct 2024))
Public records for verification
Where the interconnection, regulatory, land, environmental and corporate facts can be checked without relying on the seller.
- ERCOT's monthly GIS report is the public source for planned generation; from March 2026 it includes a Transmission Interconnection Costs Report under Planning Guide §5.2.8.4. (ERCOT, Resource Adequacy / GIS Reports page)
- ERCOT interconnection requests (GINRs) must be submitted and modified through the online RIOO-IS application. (ERCOT, Resource Integration page)
- PUCT Interchange filings are searchable by control number, case style, utility type/name, filing party, item type and date range. (PUCT Interchange Filings Search)
- Recorded instruments filed in the proper county give notice to all persons and are open to public inspection; unrecorded conveyances are void against a bona fide purchaser without notice. (Tex. Prop. Code §13.001–13.002)
- TCEQ Central Registry is the public query for regulated entity numbers, locations and owner/operator contacts. (TCEQ Central Registry)
- SEC EDGAR provides free public access to filings under the 1933, 1934, 1939 and 1940 Acts. (U.S. SEC, About EDGAR)
- The Texas Comptroller publishes a table of current JETI agreements with applicant, school district, project type, proposed investment and limitation percentage. (Texas Comptroller, JETI Current Agreements)
The market: deal volume, prices and failure rates
Published counts of project acquisitions, PPA price movement, queue completion and withdrawal rates, and the reasons projects fail, as reported by the analysts and labs that track them.
- ERCOT queue totals (Sep 2026, excluding Inactive per PG 5.2.5): solar 158 GW, wind 49 GW, gas 80 GW, battery 166 GW. (ERCOT Board, Sept 14–15, 2026 meeting materials)
- Mercom counted 165 large-scale solar project acquisitions totaling 29 GW in 9M 2025 vs 166 / 28.3 GW in 9M 2024. (Mercom Capital Group, 9M/Q3 2025 Solar Funding and M&A Report)
- Full-year 2025: 246 large-scale solar project acquisitions (up 13%) totaling 37.4 GW (down 1%); 96 corporate M&A deals. (Mercom (via Mercom India), 19 Jan 2026)
- Enverus counted 115 U.S. renewable-generation transactions in 1H24, 26 with disclosed value totaling $30.8B. (Enverus Intelligence, 9 Aug 2024)
- 2025 renewable M&A volume plateaued; solar ~45% of transactions; storage deals up >60%; tax-credit transfer volume an estimated $60B. (FTI Consulting, 23 Mar 2026)
- Interest rates and interconnection delays (4–5 year waits in PJM/MISO/CAISO) pushed some developers into portfolio sales in 2025. (FTI Consulting, 23 Mar 2026)
- In 2024 investors prioritized pipelines with realistic interconnection prospects amid grid, tariff, supply-chain and IRA uncertainty. (FTI Consulting, 7 Mar 2025)
- Wind and solar PPA prices in North America each rose nearly 9% in 2025; ERCOT wind PPAs rose 19% YoY (LevelTen data). (Utility Dive citing LevelTen Energy, 25 Feb 2026)
- LBNL: 2,061 GW active in U.S. queues; ERCOT second-largest at 408 GW; >750 GW withdrawn in 2025; withdrawal >40% even after signing an IA. (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Queued Up 2026 news release)
- Of 2000–2020 requests, only 13% of capacity had come online by end-2025 while 75% withdrew. (LBNL, Queued Up 2026 news release)
- ERCOT had the highest completion rate of any region (22% of requested capacity for 2000–2019 requests, 2025 edition). The 2026 edition puts ERCOT requests at about 24 months to an interconnection agreement on average (23.3 in the 2025 edition) and the typical project built in 2025 at 61 months from request to COD (55 months for 2024 builds in the 2025 edition). (LBNL, Queued Up 2025 Edition, 15 Dec 2025)
- Network upgrade costs for withdrawn projects (SPP, early 2020s) reached $304/kW, five times the $57/kW for projects completed in 2020–2022, illustrating upgrade cost as a failure driver. (LBNL, 27 Apr 2023)
- Cleanview counted nearly 2,000 U.S. power projects (266 GW) canceled in 2025, with high interconnection costs and local opposition among leading causes. (Latitude Media citing Cleanview, 9 Dec 2025)
- ERCOT battery queue: of 453 large projects that exited, only 27% became operational; 19 dropped out after receiving an IA in the past 18 months (Modo Energy data). (ESS News citing Modo Energy ERCOT Annual Buildout Report, 6 Feb 2026)
- Queued Up 2026 edition: the median project built in 2025 took 61 months from interconnection request to commercial operation; the median request-to-agreement time was 45 months in 2025; ERCOT requests average 24 months to an agreement. (LBNL, Queued Up 2026 Edition, June 2026)
How this page was made
Each entry is one statement tied to one public page; a second, independent pass loaded every cited page and kept only the statements that page supports. Secondary reports (trade press, law-firm alerts) are cited as what they are. Nothing here is advice, and this site does not rank, recommend or endorse any company; where a third party publishes a ranking, the entry says whose ranking it is. Found an error? Say so and it will be fixed.